“He emphasized that the FBI has been his agency’s “top partner.” “ This does not seem to me to be a role for the FBI.. don’t they have enough US criminals to catch?
Very interesting piece. It's an uncomfortable truth we seem to be dealing with that falsehoods, bad actors and would-be heroes are all muddying the truth.
I think this is an interesting article that highlights the complexity of the role intelligence agencies play in society. It’s easy to point at them when they do horrible things, but imagine eliminating these agencies completely. How so do you think it would be before people were screaming for them to come back? The bottom line is we live in a world where we have to have agencies like CIA, FBI and DHS because even though they overstep their mandates, the threats are not imaginary and the war of spies won’t end just because we might decide to eliminate our agencies.
Unfortunately, the only curative is a dogged and unrelenting press coupled with clear laws and a trustworthy judiciary. This is ultimately what the real problem was with the Patriot Act and the various NDAA’s that erased meaningful boundaries between our enemies and our citizenry. It is this reality that galvanizes my support of people like Lee, Matt T and Glen G.
I have read and listened to and corresponded with Michael Hudson. His is one point of view. So is yours. Every history has a multitude of possible relatively true points of view. Historians can think on multiple levels. There will always be an antithesis. In a higher court, your thesis of Putin as a fair minded leader would however easily be shot down.
The following assertion contradicts what this article reveals:
“The extent to which U.S. military and intelligence shapes domestic social media conversations about the Ukraine-Russia war is still unclear”
I see the government desperately trying to spin out an outcome to decrease the level of culpability-accountability under the public opinion eyes. All journalists labeled as Russian propaganda are worth the risk of being sacrificed to keep the real culprits safe. All censorship is to protect the government from any criminal charges.
For the record, I was expecting more facts from the Twitter Files considering the government still freaking out about something which it seems not being found yet but still there.
News is supposed to be for our use not theirs. Free press and all that. I see people tuning out to all of it. It’s become a joke here in middle earth (Kentucky). Keep it coming!
The FBI and disinformation are two sides of the same coin.
“He emphasized that the FBI has been his agency’s “top partner.” “ This does not seem to me to be a role for the FBI.. don’t they have enough US criminals to catch?
Hey Lee, do we subscribers need to begin putting together a bailout fund for when the FBI comes for you?
..."he is a proponent of free speech".
..."everything against our country, consider it a fake, even if it's not"
I keep reading these two statements, and simply cannot wrap my head around the guy saying this.
Maybe it's just me...
It's ridiculous the lengths to which our government will go to protect this obviously corrupt Ukrainian regime. I would love to know why?
Just subscribed. Thank you for your hard work and diligence to bring all of this to light.
Very interesting piece. It's an uncomfortable truth we seem to be dealing with that falsehoods, bad actors and would-be heroes are all muddying the truth.
“My country right or wrong” is absolutely stupid no matter the country or situation.
End this war before these idiots make it worse.
We need to make this stop.
Great summary that needs to be shared widely with people most panicked over First Amendment rights of journalists
I think this is an interesting article that highlights the complexity of the role intelligence agencies play in society. It’s easy to point at them when they do horrible things, but imagine eliminating these agencies completely. How so do you think it would be before people were screaming for them to come back? The bottom line is we live in a world where we have to have agencies like CIA, FBI and DHS because even though they overstep their mandates, the threats are not imaginary and the war of spies won’t end just because we might decide to eliminate our agencies.
Unfortunately, the only curative is a dogged and unrelenting press coupled with clear laws and a trustworthy judiciary. This is ultimately what the real problem was with the Patriot Act and the various NDAA’s that erased meaningful boundaries between our enemies and our citizenry. It is this reality that galvanizes my support of people like Lee, Matt T and Glen G.
I have read and listened to and corresponded with Michael Hudson. His is one point of view. So is yours. Every history has a multitude of possible relatively true points of view. Historians can think on multiple levels. There will always be an antithesis. In a higher court, your thesis of Putin as a fair minded leader would however easily be shot down.
Thank you -- are you really leaving Sub-stack?
Greenwald’s system update - Brazil’s Lula internet slapdown https://rumble.com/v2looka-system-update-79.html
The following assertion contradicts what this article reveals:
“The extent to which U.S. military and intelligence shapes domestic social media conversations about the Ukraine-Russia war is still unclear”
I see the government desperately trying to spin out an outcome to decrease the level of culpability-accountability under the public opinion eyes. All journalists labeled as Russian propaganda are worth the risk of being sacrificed to keep the real culprits safe. All censorship is to protect the government from any criminal charges.
For the record, I was expecting more facts from the Twitter Files considering the government still freaking out about something which it seems not being found yet but still there.
Anyways, good job Mr Lee.
News is supposed to be for our use not theirs. Free press and all that. I see people tuning out to all of it. It’s become a joke here in middle earth (Kentucky). Keep it coming!